币安华语Binance

币安华语Binance

币安华语研究员，专注于欧易币安的Web3研究报告，同时涉足Crypto加密领域。我还以"庞教主"的身份参与欧易NFT和多个交易所社区，如0x欧易、0x币安、0x火币和0xbitget。我的内容涵盖OKX新闻、alpha社区和链上投资策略。在区块链世界中，我是链上达人、链上淘金者，同时关注区块链真相和节点技术。
HomeArchives

Why is real-name authentication required for registering on cryptocurrency exchanges?

#Bitget API教程#Bybit注册流程#比特币做多做空怎么操作#冷钱包推荐#火币苹果版无法安装28
AI Translation
This post is translated from Chinese into English through AI.View Original
AI-generated summary
Many users are resistant to identity verification when registering on cryptocurrency exchanges, fearing their personal information may be compromised, especially with mandatory facial recognition. This contradicts the anonymity that cryptocurrencies initially promoted. Concerns arise about the safety of personal data during the verification process, as exchanges require sensitive information like phone numbers and IDs. Exchanges enforce Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations to mitigate risks associated with money laundering and to comply with regulatory requirements, as evidenced by significant penalties faced by traditional banks for compliance failures. A robust KYC system helps exchanges avoid legal repercussions and maintain user trust. While the risk of direct data leaks from exchanges is low due to their reputational and legal constraints, users should be cautious of indirect leak channels, such as telecom monitoring, malicious VPNs, and phishing attacks. Recommended protective measures include using physical SIM cards, opting for paid VPN services, enabling hardware security keys, and regularly changing passwords. For privacy-conscious users, a tiered approach to using exchanges is suggested, involving basic verification for small transactions and anonymous wallets for larger assets. Recommended compliant platforms include OKX and Binance, both of which have obtained necessary licenses and offer various services to enhance user security and compliance.

Many users experience strong resistance when registering on cryptocurrency exchanges due to the requirement for identity verification. Including myself, many do not want trading platforms to hold personal identity information, especially questioning the necessity of mandatory facial recognition. This contrasts sharply with the anonymity that cryptocurrencies initially advocated—why is real-name authentication still required when purchasing coins on exchanges? Does withdrawing funds from a real-name exchange inevitably lead to tracking of fund flows? Previous cases of ransomware publicly disclosing Bitcoin wallet addresses to evade tracing have further sparked deep reflections on transaction transparency.

When we complete real-name authentication on exchanges to conduct Bitcoin transactions, is there a risk of personal information leakage? The registration process requires binding sensitive information such as mobile phone numbers, ID cards, and Google emails; can trading platforms ensure data security? These concerns not only point to the purpose of the platform's information collection but also reflect users' worries about the resale of their information. This article will delve into the real-name authentication mechanism of exchanges and explore countermeasures.

Why do cryptocurrency exchanges enforce KYC authentication?#

By analyzing typical cases, we can glimpse the regulatory logic. HSBC was fined $1.9 billion for its involvement in money laundering cases linked to drug lords in Mexico and Colombia, and for providing financial services to terrorist organizations and sanctioned countries like Iran and North Korea; Standard Chartered was similarly penalized $132 million by the UK's Financial Conduct Authority for anti-money laundering loopholes, allowing criminal groups to launder $265 billion in dirty money. These cases illustrate the painful price traditional financial institutions pay for compliance failures.

Modern cryptocurrency exchanges, as hubs connecting fiat currency and digital assets, also face money laundering risks. If a platform does not implement strict KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) measures, it will face triple pressure:

  1. Heavy penalties from regulatory agencies (e.g., South Korea's Upbit faced a trust crisis due to 600,000 account verifications missing)
  2. Legal risks arising from the influx of criminal funds
  3. Business losses caused by user attrition

From the perspective of platform operation, a comprehensive KYC system serves as both a firewall against criminal liability and a filter to isolate dirty money contamination. This explains why mainstream exchanges are willing to invest heavily to obtain compliance licenses—such as OKX obtaining the first exchange license in Dubai, Binance expanding its compliance landscape across multiple countries, and Bitget investing in the licensed Hong Kong institution OSL Group, all highlighting the industry's trend towards compliance.

Is there a risk of leakage of identity verification information?#

The likelihood of exchanges actively leaking user data is extremely low, stemming from two core constraints:

  1. Business Reputation Mechanism: The incident of missing certifications at South Korea's Upbit led to a sharp decline in user numbers, confirming the devastating impact of trust collapse. Leading exchanges have daily trading volumes exceeding $10 billion, making it an irrational choice to sacrifice long-term reputation for short-term gains.
  2. Legal Accountability System: Licensed exchanges are directly governed by local financial regulatory agencies, and data breaches will trigger severe penalties.

However, users still need to be vigilant about three types of indirect leakage channels:

  • Telecommunication Operators: SMS verification may be monitored by operators.
  • Malicious VPN Services: Free VPNs often have built-in data scraping backdoors.
  • Phishing Attacks: Fake exchange pages may be used to extract authentication information.

It is recommended to take the following protective measures:

  1. Use a physical SIM card for registration to avoid virtual operators.
  2. Choose paid commercial VPNs (e.g., ExpressVPN, NordVPN).
  3. Enable hardware security keys (e.g., Yubikey) for two-factor authentication.
  4. Regularly change the login password for exchanges.

For privacy-conscious users, consider tiered usage of exchanges:

  • Basic Authentication: For small fiat deposits and withdrawals.
  • Anonymous Wallets: Transfer large assets to non-custodial wallets (e.g., Ledger/Trezor).
  • Mixing Services: Use tools like Wasabi Wallet to enhance transaction anonymity.

Recommended Compliant Trading Platforms#

Based on the latest regulatory developments and market performance in 2025, the following licensed platforms are recommended:

1. OKX or Alternative Entry#

  • Regulatory License: Full license from Dubai VARA, Singapore PSA exemption.
  • Asset Scale: $17.1 billion (an 8.2% increase from 2024).
  • Special Services:
    • Seamless connection between fiat and DeFi ecosystems.
    • Supports compliant deposits and withdrawals in over 200 countries/regions.
    • Institutional-grade cold wallet storage solutions.

2. Binance#

  • Compliance Progress:
    • Full license from Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM).
    • One of the first compliant platforms under the EU MiCA regulations.
  • Technological Innovations:
    • Zero-knowledge proof privacy trading (optional).
    • Cross-chain aggregator supporting over 50 public chains.

Further Reading#

In-depth evaluation of the top ten compliant trading platforms globally in 2025
Guide to cryptocurrency anonymization operations (including legal risk tips)

High-frequency Search Keywords#

Bitcoin anonymous purchase | Presidential coin investment | Non-KYC exchanges | Hardware wallet configuration | Mixing principles | On-chain tracking technology | Regulatory sandbox mechanisms | Privacy public chain comparison | Tornado Cash alternatives | Compliance trading tax reporting

Loading...
Ownership of this post data is guaranteed by blockchain and smart contracts to the creator alone.